Bill Cook Bill Cook's Profile Page

Bill Cook Bill Cook

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

NCP-US-6.5 New Dumps Questions - Valid NCP-US-6.5 Exam Discount

There are so many reasons for you to buy our NCP-US-6.5 exam questions. First, you will increase your productivity so that you can accomplish more tasks. Second, users who use NCP-US-6.5 training materials can pass exams more easily. An international NCP-US-6.5 certificate means that you can get more job opportunities. Seize the opportunity to fully display your strength. Will the future you want be far behind?

As mentioned earlier, It-Tests solves all problems that you face while locating updated Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) v6.5 (NCP-US-6.5) exam questions. We know that as an applicant for the test, you have excessive pressure to pass the Nutanix Certification Exam. It-Tests is here to help you earn the highly sought-after Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) v6.5 (NCP-US-6.5) certification on the first attempt.

>> NCP-US-6.5 New Dumps Questions <<

Valid NCP-US-6.5 Exam Discount | Sample NCP-US-6.5 Exam

The NCP-US-6.5 exam is one of the most valuable certification exams. The Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) v6.5 (NCP-US-6.5) certification exam opens a door for beginners or experienced It-Tests professionals to enhance in-demand skills and gain knowledge. NCP-US-6.5 exam credential is proof of candidates' expertise and knowledge. After getting success in the Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) v6.5 (NCP-US-6.5) certification exam, candidates can put their careers on the fast route and achieve their goals in a short period of time.

Nutanix NCP-US-6.5 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Utilize File Analytics for data security
Troubleshoot Nutanix Unified Storage
Configure Nutanix Volumes

Topic 2

Configure Nutanix Objects
Describe how to monitor performance and usage

Topic 3

Analyze and Monitor Nutanix Unified Storage
Describe the use of Data Lens for data security

Topic 4

Given a scenario, configure shares, buckets, and
or Volume Groups
Troubleshoot a failed upgrade for Files
Objects

Topic 5

Configure and Utilize Nutanix Unified Storage
Identify the steps to deploy Nutanix Objects

Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) v6.5 Sample Questions (Q10-Q15):

NEW QUESTION # 10
A Files administrator needs to generate a report listing the files matching those in the exhibit.
What is the most efficient way to complete this task?

A. Use Report Builder in Files Console.
B. Create a custom report in Files Console.
C. Use Report Builder in File Analytics.
D. Create a custom report in Prism Central.

Answer: C

Explanation:
The most efficient way to generate a report listing the files matching those in the exhibit is to use Report Builder in File Analytics. Report Builder is a feature that allows administrators to create custom reports based on various filters and criteria, such as file name, file type, file size, file owner, file age, file access time, file modification time, file permission change time, and so on. Report Builder can also export the reports in CSV format for further analysis or sharing. Reference: Nutanix Files Administration Guide, page 97; Nutanix File Analytics User Guide

NEW QUESTION # 11
A company is currently using Objects 3.2 with a single Object Store and a single S3 bucket that was created as a repository for their data protection (backup) application. In the near future, additional S3 buckets will be created as this was requested by their DevOps team. After facing several issues when writing backup images to the S3 bucket, the vendor of the data protection solution found the issue to be a compatibility issue with the S3 protocol. The proposed solution is to use an NFS repository instead of the S3 bucket as backup is a critical service, and this issue was unknown to the backup software vendor with no foreseeable date to solve this compatibility issue. What is the fastest solution that requires the least consumption of compute capacity (CPU and memory) of their Nutanix infrastructure?

A. Upgrade Objects to the latest version, create a new bucket, and enable NFS v3 access.
B. Delete the existing bucket, create a new bucket, and enable NFS v3 access.
C. Deploy Files and create a new Share with multi-protocol access enabled.
D. Redeploy Objects using the latest version, create a new bucket, and enable NFS v3 access.

Answer: C

Explanation:
The company is using Nutanix Objects 3.2, a component of Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS), which provides S3-compatible object storage. Due to an S3 protocol compatibility issue with their backup application, they need to switch to an NFS repository. The solution must be the fastest and consume the least compute capacity (CPU and memory) on their Nutanix infrastructure.
Analysis of Options:
* Option A (Delete the existing bucket, create a new bucket, and enable NFS v3 access): Incorrect.
Nutanix Objects does support NFS access for buckets starting with version 3.5 (as per Nutanix documentation), but Objects 3.2 does not have this capability. Since the company is using Objects 3.2, this option is not feasible without upgrading or redeploying Objects, which is not mentioned in this option. Even if NFS were supported, deleting and recreating buckets does not address the compatibility issue directly and may still consume compute resources for bucket operations.
* Option B (Deploy Files and create a new Share with multi-protocol access enabled): Correct.
Nutanix Files, another component of NUS, supports NFS natively and can be deployed to create an NFS share quickly. Multi-protocol access (e.g., NFS and SMB) can be enabled on a Files share, allowing the backup application to use NFS as a repository. Deploying a Files instance with a minimal configuration (e.g., 3 FSVMs) consumes relatively low compute resources compared to redeploying or upgrading Objects, and it is the fastest way to provide an NFS repository without modifying the existing Objects deployment.
* Option C (Redeploy Objects using the latest version, create a new bucket, and enable NFS v3 access): Incorrect. Redeploying Objects with the latest version (e.g., 4.0 or later) would allow NFS v3 access, as this feature was introduced in Objects 3.5. However, redeployment is a time-consuming process that involves uninstalling the existing Object Store, redeploying a new instance, and reconfiguring buckets. This also consumes significant compute resources during the redeployment process, making it neither the fastest nor the least resource-intensive solution.
* Option D (Upgrade Objects to the latest version, create a new bucket, and enable NFS v3 access):
Incorrect. Upgrading Objects from 3.2 to a version that supports NFS (e.g., 3.5 or later) is a viable solution, as it would allow enabling NFS v3 access on a new bucket. However, upgrading Objects involves downtime, validation, and potential resource overhead during the upgrade process, which does not align with the requirement for the fastest solution with minimal compute capacity usage.
Why Option B is the Fastest and Least Resource-Intensive:
* Nutanix Files Deployment: Deploying a new Nutanix Files instance is a straightforward process that can be completed in minutes via Prism Central or the Files Console. A minimal Files deployment (e.g.,
3 FSVMs) requires 4 vCPUs and 12 GiB of RAM per FSVM (as noted in Question 2), totaling 12 vCPUs and 36 GiB of RAM. This is a relatively low resource footprint compared to redeploying or upgrading an Objects instance, which may require more compute resources during the process.
* NFS Support: Nutanix Files natively supports NFS, and enabling multi-protocol access (NFS and SMB) on a share is a simple configuration step that does not require modifying the existing Objects deployment.
* Speed: Deploying Files and creating a share can be done without downtime to the existing Objects setup, making it faster than upgrading or redeploying Objects.
Exact Extract from Nutanix Documentation:
From the Nutanix Files Deployment Guide (available on the Nutanix Portal):
"Nutanix Files supports multi-protocol access, allowing shares to be accessed via both NFS and SMB protocols. To enable NFS access, deploy a Files instance and create a share with multi-protocol access enabled. A minimal Files deployment requires 3 FSVMs, each with 4 vCPUs and 12 GiB of RAM, ensuring efficient resource usage." From the Nutanix Objects Administration Guide (available on the Nutanix Portal):
"Starting with Objects 3.5, NFS v3 access is supported for buckets, allowing them to be mounted as NFS file systems. This feature is not available in earlier versions, such as Objects 3.2."
:
Nutanix Files Deployment Guide, Version 4.0, Section: "Deploying Nutanix Files and Configuring Shares" (Nutanix Portal).
Nutanix Objects Administration Guide, Version 4.0, Section: "NFS Access for Buckets" (Nutanix Portal).
Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) Study Guide, Section: "Nutanix Files and Objects Comparison".

NEW QUESTION # 12
An administrator has performed an AOS upgrade, but noticed that the compression on containers is not happening. What is the delay before compression begins on the Files container?

A. 30 minutes
B. 12 hours
C. 24 hours
D. 60 minutes

Answer: D

Explanation:
Nutanix Files, part of Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS), stores its data in containers managed by the Nutanix Acropolis Operating System (AOS). AOS supports data compression to optimize storage usage, which can be applied to Files containers. After an AOS upgrade, compression settings may take effect after a delay, as the system needs to stabilize and apply the new configuration.
Analysis of Options:
* Option A (30 minutes): Incorrect. A 30-minute delay is too short for AOS to stabilize and initiate compression after an upgrade. Compression is a background process that typically requires a longer delay to ensure system stability.
* Option B (60 minutes): Correct. According to Nutanix documentation, after an AOS upgrade, there is a default delay of 60 minutes before compression begins on containers, including those used by Nutanix Files. This delay allows the system to complete post-upgrade tasks (e.g., metadata updates, cluster stabilization) before initiating resource-intensive operations like compression.
* Option C (12 hours): Incorrect. A 12-hour delay is excessive for compression to start. While some AOS processes (e.g., data deduplication) may have longer delays, compression typically begins sooner to optimize storage usage.
* Option D (24 hours): Incorrect. A 24-hour delay is also too long for compression to start. Nutanix aims to apply compression relatively quickly after the system stabilizes, and 60 minutes is the documented delay for this process.
Why Option B?
After an AOS upgrade, compression on containers (including Files containers) is delayed by 60 minutes to allow the cluster to stabilize and complete post-upgrade tasks. This ensures that compression does not interfere with critical operations immediately following the upgrade, balancing system performance and storage optimization.
Exact Extract from Nutanix Documentation:
From the Nutanix AOS Administration Guide (available on the Nutanix Portal):
"After an AOS upgrade, compression on containers, including those used by Nutanix Files, is delayed by 60 minutes. This delay allows the cluster to stabilize and complete post-upgrade tasks before initiating compression, ensuring system reliability."
:
Nutanix AOS Administration Guide, Version 6.0, Section: "Compression Settings Post-Upgrade" (Nutanix Portal).
Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) Study Guide, Section: "Nutanix Files Storage Optimization".

NEW QUESTION # 13
Exhibit:

What best describes the data protection illustrated in the exhibit?

A. Availability Zones
B. Metro Availability
C. Smart DR
D. NearSync

Answer: D

Explanation:
The exhibit illustrates a data protection setup involving Nutanix Files, a component of Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS). It shows two sites: a Primary Site and a Remote Site, each with a File Server (FILE SVR1 and FILE SVR2, respectively). The Primary Site has shares (Share1, Share2, Share3, Share4) with a replication policy applied. Share1 and Share2 are marked as RW (read-write) on the Primary Site and RO (read-only) on the Remote Site, while Share3 has a replication policy with RW on both sites. Share4 is RO on the Primary Site and RW on the Remote Site. Clients access the shares on both sites, and the replication policy governs the data protection mechanism between the sites.
Analysis of the Exhibit:
* Two Sites (Primary and Remote): The setup involves replication between two sites, indicating a disaster recovery (DR) or high-availability scenario.
* Replication Policy: The replication policy is applied to the shares, with specific shares being RW on one site and RO on the other (e.g., Share1 and Share2 are RW on Primary, RO on Remote). This suggests asynchronous replication, as synchronous replication would typically allow RW access on both sites with zero data loss.
* Share3 (RW on Both Sites): This indicates a special configuration, possibly for load balancing or specific workload requirements, but the primary focus is on the replication policy for DR.
* Share4 (RO on Primary, RW on Remote): This suggests a failover scenario where the Remote Site can take over as the primary for certain shares.
Analysis of Options:
* Option A (Smart DR): Incorrect. Smart DR is a Nutanix feature that simplifies disaster recovery by automating snapshot-based replication and recovery plans. While Smart DR can use replication policies, the exhibit specifically shows a replication setup between File Servers with RW/RO configurations, which aligns more directly with a replication mechanism like NearSync. Smart DR is more about the orchestration of recovery, not the replication mechanism itself.
* Option B (Metro Availability): Incorrect. Metro Availability provides synchronous replication between two sites with zero Recovery Point Objective (RPO), meaning no data loss. It typically allows RW access on both sites (with one site being primary) and requires low latency between sites (e.g., <5 ms). The exhibit shows RW/RO configurations, indicating asynchronous replication, and does not suggest zero RPO, making Metro Availability an incorrect fit.
* Option C (Availability Zones): Incorrect. Availability Zones in Nutanix refer to distributing data across zones within a single cluster or cloud environment for high availability, not replication between two distinct sites. The exhibit clearly shows two separate sites with replication, not a single cluster with zones.
* Option D (NearSync): Correct. NearSync is a Nutanix data protection mechanism that provides near- synchronous replication with low RPOs (e.g., 1-15 minutes). It is commonly used for Nutanix Files to replicate shares between sites for disaster recovery. The exhibit's RW/RO configuration aligns with NearSync, where the Primary Site is RW, and the Remote Site is RO for replicated shares, allowing failover to the Remote Site if needed. The replication policy shown in the exhibit matches NearSync's behavior of replicating data asynchronously with a configurable RPO.
Why Option D?
NearSync is designed for disaster recovery scenarios where data is replicated between two sites with a low RPO, ensuring minimal data loss. The exhibit's depiction of replication between FILE SVR1 and FILE SVR2, with RW/RO configurations for shares, is a hallmark of NearSync for Nutanix Files. The presence of a replication policy further supports this, as NearSync uses such policies to define replication schedules and RPOs. Metro Availability (option B) would require synchronous replication with zero RPO, which is not indicated by the RW/RO setup, and the other options (Smart DR, Availability Zones) do not fit the replication scenario shown.
Exact Extract from Nutanix Documentation:
From the Nutanix Files Administration Guide (available on the Nutanix Portal):
"NearSync provides near-synchronous replication for Nutanix Files shares between two sites, enabling disaster recovery with low Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs) ranging from 1 to 15 minutes. Shares on the primary site are typically read-write (RW), while the remote site is read-only (RO) for replicated shares. A replication policy defines the replication schedule and RPO, allowing failover to the remote site in case of a disaster." Additional Notes:
* The exhibit's depiction of Share3 (RW on both sites) is a less common configuration but can be achieved with NearSync by allowing specific shares to be writable on both sites for load balancing or specific use cases. However, the overall setup (replication between sites with RW/RO for most shares) aligns with NearSync.
* Metro Availability would typically show zero RPO and RW access on both sites for the same shares, which is not the case here.
:
Nutanix Files Administration Guide, Version 4.0, Section: "Data Protection with NearSync" (Nutanix Portal).
Nutanix Data Protection Guide, Version 6.0, Section: "NearSync for Disaster Recovery" (Nutanix Portal).
Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) Study Guide, Section: "Nutanix Files Data Protection".

NEW QUESTION # 14
An administrator has deployed a new Files cluster within a Windows Environment.
After some days, he Files environment is not able to synchronize users with the Active Directory server anymore. The administrator observes a large time difference between the Files environment and the Active Directory Server that is responsible for the behavior.
How should the administrator prevent the Files environment and the AD Server from having such a time difference in future?

A. Connect to every FSVM and edit the time manually.
B. Use 0.pool.ntp.org as the NTP Server for the AD Server.
C. Use the same NTP Servers for the File environment and the AD Server.
D. Use 0.pool.ntp.org as the NTP Server for the Files environment.

Answer: C

Explanation:
The administrator should prevent the Files environment and the AD Server from having such a time difference in future by using the same NTP Servers for the File environment and the AD Server. NTP (Network Time Protocol) is a protocol that synchronizes the clocks of devices on a network with a reliable time source. NTP Servers are devices that provide accurate time information to other devices on a network. By using the same NTP Servers for the File environment and the AD Server, the administrator can ensure that they have consistent and accurate time settings and avoid any synchronization issues or errors. Reference: Nutanix Files Administration Guide, page 32; Nutanix Files Troubleshooting Guide

NEW QUESTION # 15
......

Under the tremendous stress of fast pace in modern life, sticking to learn for a NCP-US-6.5 certificate becomes a necessity to prove yourself as a competitive man. Nowadays, people in the world gulp down knowledge with unmatched enthusiasm, they desire new things to strength their brains. Our NCP-US-6.5 Practice Questions have been commonly known as the most helpful examination support materials and are available from global internet storefront. As long as you study with our NCP-US-6.5 exam questions, you are going to pass the exam without doubt.

Valid NCP-US-6.5 Exam Discount: https://www.it-tests.com/NCP-US-6.5.html

Bill Cook Bill Cook

Biography

ADDRESS

Archives

RECENT POSTS

Quick Links

Join Us